🔗 Share this article

Perhaps the most famous photographs from the 20th century depicts a nude child, her limbs spread wide, her features twisted in agony, her skin burned and raw. She is fleeing towards the camera while escaping an airstrike during the Vietnam War. To her side, youngsters are racing from the bombed community in Trảng Bàng, amid a scene of black clouds and the presence of military personnel.

This Global Influence of a Seminal Picture

Just after the distribution during the Vietnam War, this photograph—officially titled The Terror of War—evolved into a pre-digital sensation. Seen and discussed by countless people, it's broadly credited for motivating global sentiment against the American involvement during that era. A prominent critic later observed that this profoundly lasting picture featuring the young the girl suffering likely had a greater impact to increase global outrage toward the conflict than lengthy broadcasts of televised barbarities. A legendary British documentarian who documented the fighting labeled it the ultimate photograph of the so-called “The Television War”. A different experienced photojournalist remarked how the image stands as quite simply, among the most significant images in history, especially from that conflict.

The Decades-Long Claim and a Recent Claim

For half a century, the photograph was assigned to the work of Huynh Cong “Nick” Út, a then-21-year-old South Vietnamese photographer working for the Associated Press during the war. Yet a provocative recent film on a global network argues that the well-known image—long considered as the apex of photojournalism—was actually captured by someone else at the location in Trảng Bàng.

According to the film, "Napalm Girl" may have been photographed by a freelancer, who offered his work to the AP. The assertion, along with the documentary's resulting investigation, originates with a man named Carl Robinson, who claims how the dominant photo chief instructed the staff to reassign the image’s credit from the original photographer to the staff photographer, the only agency photographer on site that day.

This Investigation to find Answers

The former editor, now in his 80s, reached out to a filmmaker a few years ago, requesting support to locate the unknown photographer. He mentioned how, if he was still living, he wanted to extend an apology. The filmmaker considered the unsupported photojournalists he knew—comparing them to the stringers of today, similar to independent journalists at the time, are frequently marginalized. Their efforts is commonly questioned, and they operate in far tougher situations. They have no safety net, they don’t have pensions, they don’t have support, they usually are without adequate tools, making them extremely at risk while photographing in familiar settings.

The filmmaker wondered: “What must it feel like to be the individual who captured this photograph, should it be true that it wasn't Nick Út?” From a photographic perspective, he thought, it could be extraordinarily painful. As an observer of war photography, particularly the highly regarded documentation from that war, it might be groundbreaking, maybe reputation-threatening. The respected history of the photograph in the diaspora was so strong that the filmmaker who had family fled in that period felt unsure to engage with the project. He expressed, “I didn’t want to disrupt this long-held narrative that credited Nick the photograph. Nor did I wish to disturb the existing situation within a population that consistently respected this achievement.”

This Investigation Progresses

But both the investigator and the director felt: it was important raising the issue. As members of the press must hold everybody else accountable,” noted the journalist, “we have to can ask difficult questions about our own field.”

The investigation follows the investigators in their pursuit of their research, including testimonies from observers, to requests in today's Ho Chi Minh City, to reviewing records from related materials taken that day. Their efforts eventually yield a name: a freelancer, a driver for a television outlet at the time who sometimes sold photographs to the press on a freelance basis. In the film, a moved Nghệ, currently elderly and living in the US, claims that he handed over the image to the AP for $20 with a physical photo, only to be plagued by not being acknowledged over many years.

The Reaction and Further Scrutiny

He is portrayed in the film, reserved and thoughtful, yet his account proved explosive within the community of photojournalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to